by M. A. Indira Prameswari, Karel Yerusa
MAKASSAR—”Our community back home awaits the results of today’s meeting,” said Subair, a fisherman from Bulukumba District. His face displayed the hope he carried from the coast into an air-conditioned room at Hasanuddin University’s Science and Technology Building in Makassar.
For Subair, Wednesday, Oct. 14, 2026, represented more than just a day for formal discussions. It marked a turning point for his livelihood. At the 2026 Annual Meeting of the Fisheries Management Unit for the Fisheries Management Areas of the Republic of Indonesia (UPP-WPPNRI) 713, 714, and 715, stakeholders wagered the very pulse of Indonesia’s central and eastern fisheries sector.
Regional representatives made modest requests. As Subair noted, the small-scale fishing communities wanted clarity: about fishing quota and a better access to subsidized fuel in their villages, crucial for their livelihoods.
“They desperately hope for fair fish quotas and easier access to subsidized fuel,” Subair added.
But Subair and other fishers do not stand alone in their demands. Other managers—including the Ministry, Gubernatorial Offices, industry associations, and research institutions as policymakers were present, while non-governmental organizations (NGOs) observed the forum. Each attendee brought different interests, yet they all pursued a common mission: sustaining a resilient and thriving fisheries sector.

Managing Indonesia’s fishery resources is like managing a shared family’s savings account. Fish represent the financial balance, while stakeholders act as shareholders requiring daily sustenance. If a member decides to suck all the money for their own pocket, the interest never gets a chance to grow. Similarly, if the industry depletes the fish populations, the species will have no time to reproduce.
Therefore, reaching a consensus remains essential. At the UPP-WPPNRI forum, stakeholders—ranging from the fishing communities and business associations, to NGOs and government bureaucrats—gather to negotiate the boundaries of compromise.
The fishing community has first moved to preserve this ‘savings account’ through concrete actions. Moh, a fisherman from Central Maluku District, recounted his community’s effort. His traditional fishing association independently set aside their profits to pay villagers filling fishers’ logbooks. Collected data then sent to the Ministry’s central data bank, helping the state make science-based management decisions.

“Will the government make the same effort by ensuring us could access subsidized fuel fairly?” Moh asked. For fishers like Moh and Subair, securing accessible subsidized fuel holds just as much value as their daily efforts to maintain sustainable fish stocks.

Challenges extend far beyond grassroots. The intense UPP-WPPNRI discussions subsequently highlighted issues surrounding data accuracy and catch quotas, which fall under the direct authority of Provincial and Central Governments.
Victor Solossa, representing the Southwest Papua Provincial Government, negotiated his region’s catch quota allocation.Officials determine quota allocations based on a region’s annual fish catch data. “We must reevaluate the calculations and data quality until we can accurately produce a specific tonnage for the quota allocation,” Solossa urged officials of the Ministry.
Echoing Southwest Papua’s concerns, MDPI Governance Coordinator Karel Yerusa highlighted the issue. “Fish data originates from provinces, so Gubernatorial Offices must rigorously provide accurate data. Meanwhile, the Ministry, assisted by universities, bears the responsibility for precise quota calculations. Both entities interconnect to ensure shared prosperity,” Yerusa responded.
Syahril Abdur Raup, Director of Fish Resources Management (PSDI) at the Ministry of Marine Affairs and Fisheries (MMAF), warmly welcomed the aspirations from the nine provinces. He bluntly acknowledged bureaucratic delays. “The PKKPRL (Spatial Utilization Activity Suitability Approval for Ocean/Marine Space) permit indeed remains a difficulty we face. We need to reevaluate the fish aggregating device (FAD) policy and map existing FADs,” he explained.
The South Sulawesi Marine and Fisheries Agency (DKP), representing the nine-province FCMCs, then submitted their position paper to the PSDI Director. “In this is what we have done and what we ought to do with the Ministry,” stated Sitti Masniah Djabir, Secretary of the South Sulawesi DKP.

The South Sulawesi DKP collectively championed Moh and Subair’s struggles, representing nine-province FCMCs. These nine provinces include South Sulawesi, Southeast Sulawesi, North Sulawesi, Gorontalo, West Nusa Tenggara, East Nusa Tenggara, Maluku, North Maluku, and Southwest Papua.
The nine-province FCMCs brought three issues of their fishers:
Syahril stated that his department will weave all these aspirations into the Annual Work Plan of the Directorate General of Capture Fisheries-MMAF.

“What we do now concerns the fate of countless individuals. Many lives depend on this,” Syahril concluded at the end of the grueling three-day discussion. “Thank you to the Tuna Consortium and its members MDPI, the Indonesian Pole & Line and Handline Association (AP2HI), the IPNLF Indonesia Foundation, along with the Marine Stewardship Council,Rare Indonesia, and the WWF Indonesia Foundation, who helped facilitate this event.”
The UPP-WPPNRI is an institution created by the MMAF to manage fisheries resources and ensure they remain sustainably productive. The institution executes three primary mandates: cross-sector coordination, data-driven decision-making, and quota-based fisheries resource management. Institutional participants encompass the central government, local governments, alongside fishermen and industry players like Subair and Moh.
Alongside key fisheries actors, research institutions, non-governmental organizations, and universities actively support these functions. During the 2026 UPP-WPPNRI Meeting, participating NGOs, included the Marine Stewardship Council, Rare Indonesia, and the Tuna Consortium—which counts MDPI as a consortium member.
Buku ini disusun untuk mempermudah identifikasi spesies hewan ERS dan ETP yang
berinteraksi dengan nelayan selama aktivitas penangkapan tuna berlangsung. Semua
sumber ilustrasi gambar dan informasi pada buku ini telah dicantumkan pada daftar
referensi.
Kisah dari kampung nelayan kecil di 5 provinsi (NTB, Sulawesi Selatan, Sulawesi Utara, Maluku, Maluku Utara) diceritakan oleh masyarakat dampingan dan para pendamping MDPI. Mimpi besar untuk menjangkau lebih luas masyarakat pesisir dengan berupaya pada peningkatan kesejahteraan nelayan kecil melalui pengembangan kapasitas, membangun kemandirian, dan ketahanan ekonomi serta memperkuat institusi lokal demi mendukung perikanan berkelanjutan. Banyak pengalaman inspiratif, cerita sukses, kendala, kritikan, rasa bangga dan haru bercampur aduk dikisahkan dalam buku ini.
Penulis:
Gede Sughiarta, Nilam Ratna, Arroyan Suwarno, Alief Dharmawan,
Adjie Dharmasatya, Hairul Hadi, Muhammad Taeran, Muh. Alwi, Sahril,
Siti Zuleha, Sri Jalil, Hizran Sampalu, Karel Yerusa, Novita Ayu Wulandari,
M. Subhan Moerid.
Penyunting:
Gede Sughiarta, Arroyan Suwarno, Nilam Ratna, Alief Dharmawan
Desain/Layout:
Gede Sughiarta
Foto:
Yayasan MDPI, Gede Sughiarta
Illustrasi:
Panca Kumara